A tool from Endgame

How Much Bitcoin Should I Own?

The honest answer is almost certainly more than the 1–5% the industry recommends. Here is the math it skips, and what Bitcoin is actually replacing.

1

Kelly Criterion

Your conviction60%
The probability Bitcoin delivers the payoff below. At 60%, you think there is a 6-in-10 chance it works.
The payoff if you're right
If it works, how many times your alternative does Bitcoin return. 3× means it triples what bonds would have.
Risk setting  🎲
Half Kelly is the standard safety margin. Full Kelly maximizes growth but stings; quarter is conservative.
23%
of net worth  ·  $233k  ·  3.89 BTC
Full 47%  ·  Half 23%  ·  Quarter 12%
Industry norm1–5%
Your number23%
The conventional sliver is a Kelly underbet for anyone who actually believes the thesis.

Before you act on that number

  • Kelly punishes wrong inputs. Overstate your edge and it sizes you into ruin. Be honest about the probability.
  • Discount the historical growth rate. A multi-trillion-dollar asset cannot repeat its small-base returns, so haircut the payoff.
  • For most people, 5–25% is the realistic landing. The point is not "all in." It is that 1–5% is too small for real conviction.
2

Modern Portfolio Theory

Pick a time horizon and the risk level you are comfortable with, anchored to the classic stock and bond blends. The optimizer finds the mix of stocks, the safe asset, and Bitcoin that earns the most at that risk. Then flip the safe asset from today's bonds to a 9% Bitcoin-backed credit sleeve, the rate that exists in the free market, and watch the whole portfolio change.

Time horizon
Your risk level
The safe asset
Bonds today pay a suppressed rate at real duration risk. The credit sleeve pays a market 9% at low risk, the difference between a rate set by a central bank and one set by a market.
At the 60/40 risk level (10-year data, bonds as the safe asset): the optimal mix is 40% stocks, 54% bonds, 6% Bitcoin, earning 10.2% versus 9.5% for the classic 60/40 blend, at the same risk.
Your selected portfolio, before and after
PortfolioStocksBondsCreditBitcoinReturnRisk
Before: classic 60/4060%40%0%0%9.5%10.2%
After: optimized40%54%0%6%10.2%10.0%

Assumptions (10-year total return, real data through July 2026 via FMP and CryptoCompare; the 9% credit sleeve is a Cadena target at low, defined risk): stocks 15.0% return / 15.3% std dev; bonds 1.3% / 5.1%; Bitcoin-backed credit 9.0% / 2.0%; Bitcoin 57.8% / 73.8%. Correlations: stock-bond 0.4, stock-Bitcoin 0.33, bond-Bitcoin 0.15.

  • Stock, bond and Bitcoin figures are real trailing total returns, not forecasts. The 9% credit sleeve is Cadena's target net rate at low, defined, hedgeable risk, not a guaranteed return.
  • Each optimized mix carries the same risk as the classic blend on its row, so the extra return is not bought with extra risk.

Allocation is only half the argument

The other half is what Bitcoin replaces. Modern portfolio theory gave us the 60/40: equities for growth, bonds for the safe asset. The problem is that the safe asset is no longer safe. Stocks and bonds fell together in 2022, the model's worst year on record. Bonds spent much of the last fifteen years paying no real yield, and long Treasuries lost roughly 30% in 2022.

The deeper issue is the label. The economics and credit quality of sovereign debt have steadily deteriorated, yet we still call it risk-free. A government bond is a claim on an issuer whose fiscal path keeps worsening, repaid in a currency it can print at will. In a world where central banks stop buying the bonds to suppress the rate, the market clears far higher, and a 9% real yield on sound-money collateral is what the safe asset should actually pay.

Putting it together: your portfolio

The optimized portfolio at your 60/40 risk level over 10 years, sized to your net worth, with the safe asset set to bonds above.

A classic 60/40 (bonds)

Equities60% · $600k
Bonds40% · $400k

Your optimized portfolio

Equities40% · $400k
Bitcoin6% · $60k
Bonds54% · $540k

This is today’s world, with bonds as the safe asset. Flip the safe asset to the 9% credit sleeve above and watch the optimizer rebuild the portfolio.

Two lenses on Bitcoin sizing. This optimized portfolio holds 6% in Bitcoin; your conviction-based Kelly number above was 23% ($233k, 3.89 BTC). One is bounded by risk, the other by conviction; the right answer sits between them.

This is the argument of Endgame, out now. And the 9% credit layer that replaces bonds is what we build at Cadena.

See where Bitcoin fits in your portfolio. Let's talk.
Book a meeting
For education, not investment advice. Stock, bond and Bitcoin figures use real trailing total-return data; past performance is not a forecast. The credit sleeve's 9% is a target at defined, hedgeable risk, not a guaranteed return. Bitcoin is volatile and you can lose money. It's just math.